Redis vs MongoDB: Which One Do You Need to Choose? - (r)
Share on
In this article, we will look at the commonalities and differences in MongoDB and Redis in order to assist you in determining the one that is best suited to your project. Make the best decision today can prevent some tremendous headaches in the coming years.
MongoDB and Redis Different Storage Solutions to Meet different needs
MongoDB keeps data on disk as collections comprising Binary JSON (BSON) documents in default. This on-disk storage offers greater capacity and lower risk of system crashes. The storage of data in BSON documents allows MongoDB to accommodate the many types of data formats that JSON can't comprehend. Furthermore, it is able to store information in memory or in cloud.
In addition, MongoDB has no schema or fixed structure for data and does not require the development of documents. This makes it more accessible to novice users and quicker at processing huge amounts of data at a long periods of time.
MongoDB also offers superior scaling, offering an exceptional selection of vertical, horizontal and flexible options. This makes the database easily adaptable to subsequent adjustments, making it more suitable choice for entrepreneurs or businesses who need to plan for future developments and growth.
However, if your project involves rapidly changing data, Redis is the better alternative. Redis's versatility Redis is due to the fact that it stores information in key/value formats that can handle a broad range of data types. It can also function in the role of a messaging broker and cache.
Database Architecture
The structure of a database determines the criteria to collect, store and retrieval of data, as well as the enhancement and integration of data in an individual database management system. An understanding of the structure of a database is crucial since it influences the performance of databases as well as scalability.
However, Redis relies heavily on key/value stores, which store the data in a specific collection that contains two things: a key and the value that it has assigned. It uses a unique identifyr (a key) to save and retrieve specific details. The keys are kept in a dictionary, and they need a parser in order to allow it to process a variety of values (because every key is able to contain one value as of default).
Redis is also able to support various types of data structures and values like hashes, strings, sets, lists, set, sets, streams, geospatial indexes, and bitmaps. However, their storage capacity is limited by the available storage space on the RAM, and stored data is not so easily scalable and accessible as time passes.
MongoDB and Redis: Key Differences
Below is a table that outlines the key differences and similarities among MongoDB and Redis:
| MongoDB | Redis | |
| Speed | Schema-less structure allows high speed in the event that large quantities of data are stored on-disk. | It is much faster as MongoDB in the event that large volumes of data are kept within its memory storage. |
| Scalability |
The built-in sharding feature allows scaling across multiple geographical regions and nodes.
Hashed sharding, range sharding, zone sharding, and cross-shard operations are available. The backups of a consistent cloud can easily be accessed with MongoDB Atlas. Multi-language features are supported by the majority of official and community drivers. |
Redis cluster allows for scaling.
Hashed Sharding by itself. Shards are maintained manually. No consistency in shard backup. Driver support is limited. |
| Transactional Data Integrity | Multi-document ACID transactions are supported with multi-statement syntax. |
Multi-record and multi-command transaction assistance.
No default rollbacks support. |
| Memory Use | On-disk storage. Utilizes lots of memory. 1 GB per 100,000 assets. |
In-memory storage. It requires about 4GB of RAM.
Higher memory usage more than MongoDB. |
| Indexes |
Index construction is straightforward and diverse.
MongoDB Atlas Performance Advisor is able to provide users with new indexes. Secondary indexes can easily be used to build applications to process data in various methods. |
Secondary indexes cannot be easily built and are manually maintained. |
| High Access | High-availability through replication. | High availability through primary-secondary replication across multiple nodes and centers. |
| query Language |
MongoDB MySQL API queries documents with text searches, ranges, and single or multiple keys.
It produces materialized versions of retrieved data (on request) as well as geospatial queries and graph traversals. |
Key-value queries alone. Lower query functions that is enhanced by other Redis modules. |
| Persistent Store | Persistent volume feature in Kubernetes achieves data/storage persistence. | Append-Only File data persistence and Snapshot assist in persistence of storage. |
| Agregation of Information |
Map reduce function, as well as an aggregation pipeline can be used to facilitate data aggregate.
MongoDB Atlas makes use of the aggregation pipeline builder tool to build and process pipelines for aggregation. |
Map reduce function and pipelines for aggregation are utilized. |
MongoDB vs Redis: Ideal Usages
It is important to look at specifications in a comparison when choosing between any two technologies choosing the right database system for you most strongly depends on the type of software you're developing.
If speed and lower latency are the deciding aspects, then Redis is the most suitable choice for optimum performance. Redis can take on the demands of various applications, including fraud detection and modern game development that require large amounts of ever-changing, instantaneous data efficiently and quickly.
Redis with
This can help with the performance of your WordPress projects through the permanent storage of data generated by WordPress's native object cache. Persistent storage will allow the project to use cached objects instead of querying the MySQL database twice (or more) to retrieve the exact object. This ultimately reduces the time to respond of an online site and also the load on the MySQL database as well as increasing the capability to process the traffic.
Summary
MongoDB and Redis are both excellent database administration options. Their differences in storage, model, architecture, and capabilities mean that the right choice will depend on the specific requirements of your project.
MongoDB is stable, reliable ideal for projects that are general-purpose. But its disk-based storage model makes it relatively slow to process real-time data.
In contrast, Redis' in-memory storage makes it much better at handling massive volumes of real-time data. However, it does not perform as well, and has a higher threshold for entry-level developers.
The Redis add-on from can be easily integrated Redis into your project without having to worry about the complexity of managing the system. It also increases your productivity through focusing your attention on more business-related issues.
- Simple setup and management on the My dashboard
- 24/7 expert support
- The most efficient Google Cloud Platform hardware and network, driven by Kubernetes for the highest scalability
- A high-end Cloudflare integration for speed and security
- Reaching a global audience with the possibility of 35 data centers and around 275 POPs